January 20, 2026, 6:00 PM Regular

Berkeley Council narrows ADU tenant right‑to‑purchase to 90 days and exempts middle‑housing from design review

Link

Meeting Overview

Mayor Adena Ishii opened the first regular Council meeting after the winter recess with a land acknowledgement. All eight councilmembers were present: Kesarwani (D1), Taplin (D2), Bartlett (D3), Tregub (D4), O’Keefe (D5), Blackaby (D6), Lunaparra (D7), and Humbert (D8). The meeting included a Poet Laureate transition ceremony (outgoing Aya DeLeon; incoming Hanan Masri). The Council announced Vice Mayor Cecilia Lunaparra for the coming quarter. A proposal to repeal Berkeley’s tear‑gas ban had been removed from the agenda prior to the meeting; multiple speakers urged the ban remain in place.

Main Agenda Items

  • Consent calendar (adopted unanimously): notable items called out by councilmembers and public included
    • Item 6: extension/expansion of the Throne Lab portable toilet pilot (noted public interest; accessibility concerns raised about automatic timed egress signals).
    • Item 8: authorization allowing retail alcohol sales in the Telegraph Avenue commercial district.
    • Item 9: removal of outdated bicycle/e‑bike licensing/registration requirements and retention of the prohibition on adults riding bikes on sidewalks (exception for children); staff/advocates welcomed referral to create clearer rules.
    • Item 13: program to engage emerging nonprofit affordable‑housing developers.
    • Item 17: funding for Caminos al Exito; several councilmembers contributed discretionary funds.
    • Item 18: referral to develop comprehensive Transportation Design Standards; WalkBike Berkeley and other groups urged safety‑focused standards and field testing.
    • Item 19: referral to consider permitting tiny homes on wheels as ADUs.
    • KPFA building proponents spoke in favor of landmark designation.
  • ADU condominium conversion (AB 1033) — public hearing and deliberation:
    • Staff presented a draft Chapter 21.29 to implement AB 1033, allowing ministerial condominiumization (separate sale) of qualifying ADUs without creating new development rights. Two councilmembers recused (Kesarwani, Tregub).
    • Vice Mayor Lunaparra introduced supplemental tenant protections (no‑fault eviction limits, right of first refusal, five‑year restrictions after certain evictions, option to pay mitigation fee or elect rent control).
    • Major policy tradeoffs debated: tenant protections (ROFR, eviction safeguards) versus preserving incentives for owners to convert/build ADUs; interaction with Measure Q and the Rent Stabilization Ordinance; and the scope/size of any affordable‑housing mitigation fee.
    • Council considered three approaches (staff/Planning Commission, Lunaparra/Bartlett supplemental, and a Mayor/majority supplemental capping tenant ROFR at 90 days).
    • A roll‑call vote adopted Councilmember Humbert’s substitute: shorten the ROFR period for “covered” tenants to 90 days (replacing a one‑year ROFR in the Planning Commission version); a motion to extend 90‑day ROFR to all tenants failed.
    • Negotiations continued on owner‑move‑in eviction language and the mitigation fee; no final ordinance adoption for AB 1033 was recorded in the excerpt.
  • Zoning amendments / Program 32 (middle housing and design review):
    • Staff proposed by‑right approvals for qualifying housing projects on identified opportunity sites and an abbreviated staff‑level design review to preserve ministerial approvals.
    • Councilmember Kesarwani’s amendment to exempt Mixed‑Use Residential (MUR) middle‑housing projects from a non‑binding design‑review meeting passed unanimously; the ordinance as amended passed unanimously.
  • Other adopted items: Vital Records fee changes and selected recreation/camp fee adjustments were approved unanimously; staff were asked to return with equity and benchmarking analyses.

Decisions Made

  • Consent calendar adopted unanimously; items listed above will proceed per staff timelines.
  • Council adopted Humbert’s substitute narrowing tenant exclusive right‑to‑purchase (ROFR) for covered ADU tenants to 90 days; a proposal to apply 90 days to all tenants failed.
  • No final vote on the full AB 1033 ordinance was recorded; Council continued deliberations on owner‑move‑in treatment and the affordable‑housing mitigation fee.
  • MUR middle‑housing projects were exempted from the Planning Commission’s non‑binding design‑review meeting; the related ordinance (as amended) passed unanimously.
  • Vital Records fee changes and Recreation/camp fee adjustments were adopted unanimously.
Transcription